BMA Council Report May 2019
Apologies for the lateness of this report - Junior Doctors Conference and issues around the junior doctors' contract and lots of student issues have slowed us down.
The meeting on 15th May was reasonably productive. There was significant anger from some members of Council at the recent leaks surrounding spousal expenses and the sexism allegations in the press. We do not share this. We applaud the bravery of those who have spoken out against poor treatment and rotten cultures in the BMA.
We received a confidential update on member support services, which the BMA is reviewing in detail. This includes the First Point of Contact, Employment Advisers and legal support given to members, which we aim to continually improve. The Broad Left welcomes the review, and hopes it will highlight solutions for the problems members face when engaging with us.
We discussed guidelines for the process of selecting members to European Medical Organisations. This aims to make it a more accountable process. The highlights are: a selection committee would select suitable candidates based on role criteria, representatives must demit office if they are no longer a member of the relevant branch of practice, and that records will be kept of meeting purpose and expense. Council approved these guiding principles with immediate effect.
The Working Together Better task group has been consideringa definition of the role “Chief Officer”,which is a term frequently used in the organisation’s articles and byelaws butwith no universal understanding of what this means. A definition was proposedto council in a paper, however concerns were raised as to the wording. It wasalso considered that it would only apply for a short time - until the completionof a review by the appointments oversight sub-committee. Some concerns wereexpressed that defining a “Chief Officer” beyond the actual role title couldlead to power grabbing and increased control by a few senior elected members. Itwas resolved that the definition would be altered to reflect comments made bymembers, and subsequently recirculated to council for consideration at a laterdate.
A motion was brought to council to change the agreed processfor hustings at the ARM for theroles of Treasurer, Chair of the Representative Body and Deputy RB Chair toinclude questions to candidates to be permitted at the hustings. The proposerexplained that the motion aimed to give us a better chance of getting the bestpeople into roles, by allowing for a more accountable and informative electionprocess.
Several concerns were raised by council members includingissues with time, and that not all candidates would perform well underquestioning (and indeed this may put some people off applying). A representativefrom the ARM agenda committee explained that it would be very difficult tofacilitate extra time for questions, and that we would potentially lose asignificant amount of debates as a result. They were also concerned that longhustings may disengage representatives.
The motion was not carried, and it was decided that hustings would take placeas agreed by Council in January.
Council received an oral and written update from the Auditand Risk Committee.
A discussion regarding membership of LNCs was held in private. Current rules can exclude non-BMA members from LNCs due to the BMA staff and resources they rely on. A paper presented by the Secondary Care Forum was agreed upon. We will update this report at such a time as the resolutions from this discussion are made public.
Another confidential update was made to Council about workongoing to improve the code of conductand resolutions processes. This is very necessary work in the context ofboth tight political control and increasing awareness of sexism in the BMA. Confidencemust increase if the system is to work well.
Council received a brief update from Jeeves Wijesuriya,chair of JDC, about the junior doctorcontract negotiations. He shared with council the successes so far whichinclude shared parental leave, child bereavement leave, and money for juniordoctor facilities. As negotiations are still ongoing there was not much morethat could be shared at this time.
A discussion was had about how best to approach two unfilled council seats, following theresignation of two members. It was decided to leave the national UK seatunfilled (given that the total number of council members is comfortable abovethe minimum at present), and that the next highest candidate from the WestMidlands region is elected as a non-voting member for the remainder of theCouncil term. Although we would want as many voting members representingregions as is possible, the cost of running new elections at each resignationis prohibitive.
Council received a confidential update from the board of directors, addressing mattersof finance and governance. Many broad left members spoke up in support oftransparency and accountability in this area and called for investigation intoprevious lapses in internal governance. The funding for Spousal expenses and theLock Club has now ended, but we feel there are further questions to be asked.
We keep working hard on Council and in various other rolesin the BMA. Working with some other members, we have assurances that Place ofWork Accredited Representatives (POWARs) and the training for that will be reintroduced.This is one step towards the rank-and-file trade unionism we need.